Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Punjab Nahin Jaoongi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Just ask if a copy for Draft: space is required. Black Kite (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Main Punjab Nahin Jaoongi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and most likely isn't notable. CyanoTex (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The film appears notable, at least among the gossip circles (see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc.). As the film's cast is not yet firmed up and principal photography has not yet begun, it is probably too soon to create this article. I've already had to correct one fact: Iman Ali has dropped out of the production. Let's wait a while to see if this film's planning phase shakes out and actually makes it into production. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

| Noted. Also, the guy could have done a better job on the article, to be honest._ CyanoTex (talk) 13:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @CyanoTex: AFD is not a venue to punish bad writing. If the article needs to be improved, improve it. AFD is only to discuss whether there are sufficient sources from which to build a valid article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

| Noted._ CyanoTex (talk) 13:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Move to Draftspace Needs more than gossip rags. Unsourced, and fails WP:NFILM: Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines. I would not be opposed to a recreation once it's released (assuming it makes WP:GNG ) or moving to Draftspace for the time being. ^Avic _ennasis @ 17:06, 18 Kislev 5777 / 17:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally unsourced article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.