Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 02:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Magic (TV series)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2019

PROD removed with "deprod; may well be notable; not an uncontroversial deletion" but nothing added to suggest that it is notable. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WP:NTVNATL would suggest this is likely notable, so deprodding was reasonable. Jclemens (talk) 06:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Once again, I would point out that prodding is for uncontroversial deletion only! Its misuse is getting wearing. AfD is the appropriate forum for discussing articles that may well be notable (as this clearly may well be). -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and WP:RPRGM. No source in article which is a translation of an article, which is also unsourced. BEFORE showed listings and promo, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Let me know if something is found. // Timothy :: talk 00:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.