Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macarthur FC–Western Sydney Wanderers FC rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 10:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Macarthur FC–Western Sydney Wanderers FC rivalry[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Of the provided sources, only this one mentions the existence of a rivalry at all, and still does not cover the rivalry aspect in significant depth. The rivalry also appears to have only existed for one year thus far; it is likely WP:TOOSOON for serious coverage to have been written about this subject. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 11:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Cuoxo (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for UPE, sockpuppetry. MER-C 18:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not much of a rivalry yet! Govvy (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per WP:NRIVALRY, sports rivalries do not inherently warrant stand-alone articles and the subject must meet GNG. There is not enough to establish notability for this supposed rivalry at this moment and any suggestion that this rivalry will be notable in future is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with he nom as it way too soon for this rivalry to exist yet, maybe in the future this could be one but for now I say delete. HawkAussie (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.