Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOS hex format

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn as Speedy Keep per discussion (non-admin closure)   // Timothy :: talk  17:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOS hex format[edit]

MOS hex format (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG   // Timothy :: talk  14:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  14:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  14:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment This appears to be misnamed, as I got ten times as many hits using "MOS Technology format". 392 GHits still isn't a lot, but there are plenty of places explaining it; I'm not sure what that says about its its importance. Mangoe (talk) 19:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment This article was written as it was a red link on several of the See Also pages Krallja (talk) 00:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment Per Krallja and Mangoe this might be a better Rename leaving a redirect.   // Timothy :: talk  00:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.