Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukwata (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 06:25, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lukwata[edit]

Lukwata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, could not find sufficient RS coverage. –dlthewave 04:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per previous AfD entry. Also, 5 mins on google scholar and I found mention of this animal/mythical creature in a RS, which I added to the page. This tells me that additional RS are out there, and that any problems the article itself has should be fairly easy to clean up. Ryan shell (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possible Keep - previous AfD entry is a joke, but looking into it, there might actually be something salvageable as a legendary creature. --tronvillain (talk) 20:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Another WP:RS citation added, it wasn't difficult to find. Narky Blert (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.