Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Freeborn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Freeborn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass GNG, NENT, or ANYBIO. Lack of reliable independent secondary sources for a BLP. Only current source is an alumni magazine article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing comes up as more than day-to-day behind-the-scenes work in the film industry. --Calton | Talk 04:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of RS coverage to meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:CREATIVE. PohranicniStraze (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.