Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy De Ville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Closed as no consensus after 3 weeks of discussions and relistings. Weak keep comments lean towards GNG but consensus is not clearly established. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy De Ville[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about a band, and not found sources to add. It has been tagged as relying on primary sources since 2007. It has no footnotes and the two external links are an interview and the archived page for the band's website. I do not think it mets WP:NMUSIC. Tacyarg (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. Tacyarg (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep passes WP:NBAND#6 with two (or more) notable members (albeit as singer-actors). They issued a studio album and an EP. I have supplied refs.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 00:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Ugh. I suspect that Shaidar cuebiyar will turn out to be correct, BUT WP:BAND6 refers to musicians, yet the articles for the two members refers to them as actresses. By some definitions, these folks are musicians; by others, they are not. On balance, I'll hold my nose, and vote for a marginal keep. Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 04:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.