Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucha House Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The strongest arguments came from those supporting deletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lucha House Party[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. This is a non notable trio which has only be together for a few months without a tag team championship match nor have they won a tag team championship. History section consists of a brief feud seems to have been beefed up by adding what one of its members did shortly before the trio was formed. EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 21:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 21:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 21:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability seems established.Germcrow (talk) 10:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The usual WWE Problem. They bring new wrestlers, but forgets them in a few days, with no notable storylines. This is not The Bar o New Day, who had a lot of feuds and storylines and matches, they just worked on Weekly TV programs. No notable. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The cited sources are simply too weak. There may be weak signs of notability for some individual wrestlers but certainly not for the group. ProWrestling.net name drops the subject once here inside a listing of numerous events, while this text on ProWrestling.net, this and this on Pro Wrestling Torch Newsletter, this on ProWrestling Insider, and this on Wrestling Observer Newsletter do not even mention the subject. Buried in a Wrestling Observer listing of upcoming events is the group name, misspelled as "Lucha House Part." There are some collateral, online-search hits on the (unrelated) subject of the Lucha Underground, which may be confusing our issue here. -The Gnome (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.