Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LosPollosTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None of the keep rationales posit policy-based reasons for keeping the article, and if the article were kept solely for these reasons, it would fail WP:V. Therefore consensus is that the topic is not encyclopedically notable. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LosPollosTV[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is almost completely unreferenced with blatant BLP violations which I had removed, but were re-added. Seems to have trivial coverage only for holding a Guinness World Record of the longest Twitch stream. Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 03:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

The page is very informal. It should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubwalk69 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Los is a streamer with one of the higher view counts on twitch and with his involvement with such streamers as CashNasty, xQc and NICKMERCS and NBA Players such as Zach LaVine and Ben Simmons, The article should be kept. KENGRIFFEYFAN24 — Preceding unsigned comment added by KENGRIFFEY24FAN (talk • contribs) Note corrected username; the 24 comes before the FAN. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Los has a huge fan base on Twitch and other platforms. He deserves a wikipedia page for his fan base. He’s nearly surpassed 500k followers on the platform. As noted above, he often does live streams with other famous people such as Zach Lavine, Ben Simmons, Joel Embiid, and more. This article strongly in my opinion should be kept.

TubWalk69 — Tubwalk69 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Invalid criteria: That person A has a relationship with well-known person B

It is important to remember that "notable" is not a synonym for "famous"

Wikipedia:Notability (people). Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 04:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Los has a considerable fanbase and does have a notability among the Twitch Community, he is a notable person and should have his own Wikipedia Page. Also, the fact that Los is signed to Luminosity Gaming, gives him more credibility as a Streamer as he is part of a larger e-sports organization and one of the more well-known players signed to Luminosity. KENGRIFFEYFAN24 — Preceding unsigned comment added by KENGRIFFEY24FAN (talk • contribs) 04:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't even how you use speedy keep, and neither does your argument carry any weight, because notability is not inherited, and neither does having a lot of subscribers or viewers establish notability. Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 05:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Striked duplicate vote. Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 16:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I don't know what you have against me or this article, but you're really trying to go to war over this. I made this article because Los has gotten to the point where he is notable enough to deserve one. I saw that you just came on to the reddit and wanted to delete this so, I give up. You will keep on fighting this fight until I die or you win, so I don't know what to say other than,I wanted this to stay up. Also the "neither does having a lot of subscribers or viewers establish notability" Pretty much invalidates every person who is an internet personality on this website. KENGRIFFEYFAN24

Delete Seems to be a clear example or WP:SINGLEEVENT notability in it's current state. Far more sources & other claims to notability are needed. Remember new editor / subject fans, even Pewdiepie was deleted for notability issues when he was first starting out. — IVORK _Talk 05:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Los is one of the biggest streamers on Twitch and HAS played with many big names, he is so entertaining and does deserve his own page, there are only a few people out there who want to mess around and make jokes, we'll come up with new citations we promise, just give us some time. Lil Tasty

@Lil Tasty: There's no reason that can't be done in the draftspace, and I would look to sites like Fandom initially as they have practically no requirements for pages — IVORK _Talk 07:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per previous arguments, ~~but a far more interesting question is why we have a nominator arguing for Keep who has made no edits outside the page?~~ scratch that the page formatting looked weird first. Asartea ^Trick ^| ^Treat 06:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable streamer, WP:1E applies. Java Hurricane 07:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's impossible to source this to anything other than social media; no significant coverage from WP:RS at all Spiderone 08:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A case of 1E. Clearly lacks any kind of real coverage to confer notability. TheRedDomitor (talk) 08:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Louis is a huge influencer on Twitch’s platform. Among the previously explained reasons, I would like to state that if you were apart of the Twitch community and saw Louis in public, you would recognize him. Just like how a baseball fan would recognize one of the players from their team in public. TubWalk69 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubwalk69 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate vote: Tubwalk69 has already voted once. TheRedDomitor (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly non notable per our guidelines. Being a "huge influencer" or having all da followers, maaan make zero difference. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok all of you who want this article deleted are actually buzkills. How come Aaron Sherinian gets to keep his article up yet Los doesn't, blatant hypocrisy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KENGRIFFEY24FAN (talk • contribs) 16:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should read our policies, specifically WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:GNG. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What does one person have to do with the other? The only connection I see is that Aaron Sherinian was nominated for deletion three years ago by someone with the username User:KENGRIFFEY24 (who I assume is the same person as User:KENGRIFFEY24FAN) and passed with a "speedy keep". Sherinian isn't a Twitch streamer or at least his article doesn't say he is one. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KENGRIFFEY24FAN Note the points raised on that AfD, being the head of a prominent company and also receiving notable awards. Not to mention that the article has multiple reliable sources, not just the subject's own social media and a single mention in media. Per Lee Vilenski, read WP:GNG & WP:NBIO to see the requirements that need to be met for all articles on individuals. — IVORK _Talk 01:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable at this point. I note that the article is almost entirely sourced to the subject's twitter and instagram accounts. -- Whpq (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about him aside from being banned from Twitch, an indication of WP:BLP1E. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nbsp;Preceding unsigned comment added by KENGRIFFEY24FAN (talk contribs) 16:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. per nom. Mr-5 / (M 📩 ✉ / C🖋 ) 13:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements. // Timothy :: talk 08:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.