Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu Chang (actor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liu Chang (actor)[edit]

Liu Chang (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACTOR or WP:NSINGER. Article is unsourced and WP:BEFORE turned up nothing that meets direct and indepth WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS / WP:IS. Wikipedia needs to follow sourcing and notability guidelines strictly for BLPs.   // Timothy :: talk  15:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  15:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  15:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  15:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Meliora: I did re-write this article, so please reconsider your opinion on this AfD. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
VocalIndia Thank you for your contribution. I'd like to point out a few principles: 1. WP:GNG requires indepth WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS / WP:IS. 2. WP:INHERITED is not a good argument, i.e. being associated with something notable (e.g. appearing in a notable film) does not automatically make the subject notable. The subject must be notable in its own right. 3. WP:NACTOR does not supercede WP:GNG but is merely a helpful rule of thumb. 4. Everthing that's notable for regional Wikipedia projects is not necessarily notable for English-language Wikipedia.
Now specifically with respect to this article, unfortunately, even after your new edits, I am not convinced the subject meets WP:N. Further, per WP:NFILM, just being released does not make a film notable. This is an encyclopaedia, for listings database, there's IMDB (which, by the way is not WP:RS / WP:IS.). Tomb of the Sea Side Story: Hua Mei itself will be nominated for deletion as none of the Chinese sources cited are WP:RS / WP:IS.. — Ad Meliora TalkContribs 12:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He meet WP:NACTOR, had a lead role in the 2018 film Tomb of the Sea Side Story: Hua Mei (沙海番外之画媒), and 2020 TV series Reunion: The Sound of the Providence. A basic Google search show that these dramas did all air. The series don't have WP articles, but that is not an indication of non-notability, they simply have no been created yet. Trying to find English-language sources for a Chinese subject and automatically brushing aside native-language sources is truly narrow systematic bias. I fond enough sources in Chinese to say that he meets WP:GNG, see [1], [2],[3], [4]. Btw I will create WP article for his film and TV series and add this sources to the article. Cheer VocalIndia (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have created his film article Tomb of the Sea Side Story: Hua Mei, also added sources, tone down promo and major expanded to the article. I think there is sufficient evidence that he meets WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.VocalIndia (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment (undecided) - A search for his Chinese name, 劉暢, reveals a lot of results in what appear to be entertainment news websites in that country. He definitely has a lot of media coverage in his own right. Since I cannot read Mandarin I am unable to determine if those sources are sufficiently reliable, but I recommend that this discussion proceed in that direction. DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 22:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.