Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little League Softball World Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 01:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Little League Softball World Series[edit]

This is softball tournament for children only. It's very not notable, informations are too poor, low quality. This tournament doesn't meet this criteria. Banhtrung1 (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge into Little League Baseball or Little League World Series. While this article could use some work, this is a tournament that comprises teams from six continents. Yes, they are children, but that's hardly justification for deletion. I was able to find all kinds of sources on the LL Softball World Series, including this one in the Washington Post today [1]. For heaven's sake, it is being broadcast live on ESPN!! [2][3]. I think that counts as "non-trivial coverage". I really am gobsmacked that someone would consider a Little League World Series to be "not notable". -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 04:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per the nominator's strong misunderstanding of WP:GNG and WP:BEFORE. Dea db eef 09:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per above - definitely passes WP:GNG. Ansh6 6 6 17:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all: Notable per Shinmawa. A merge discussion can take place on the articles' talk pages. SL93 (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.