Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of units of the International Sociological Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 03:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of units of the International Sociological Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list about non-notable entries. Notability can't be inherited from ISA which appears to be the mother article. Irakakiku (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing convincing of its own article. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to International Sociological Association. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The internal structure of an organization is not generally notable. There is already a separate WP article about the organization itself, but there is nothing of public interest in its internal organizational structure. OtterAM (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 18:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.