Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tractors built by other companies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of tractors built by other companies[edit]

List of tractors built by other companies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable sub-list. Emerging consensus to delete on talk page RM. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 16:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 16:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Engineering, and Transportation. WCQuidditch 16:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a rather random collection of information. Rebadging and outsourcing of tractor manufacturing should appear in the model article, when available. Not combined in a list. gidonb (talk) 04:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced and not particularly useful. 162 etc. (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The lack of sources and context makes the article very hard to understand. And even with the explanation on the talk page which clarifies the scope I still can't really understand what each entry is trying to convey. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: WP:TNT. lack of sourcing makes this near-impossible to maintain, especially as this would be great for promotion. Password (talk)(contribs) 20:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.