Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Bhopal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Bhopal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Removed PROD as per procedure as this article has been at AfD before and was deleted. I still don't think it warrants an article.

I know that there is no definite line drawn as to when "List of tallest buildings in ___" become notable or not notable. I would say, however, that wherever we draw that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons:

Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the overwhelming majority of the buildings featured are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article.
Secondly, this topic does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Database listings in Skyscraperpage, CommonFloor and Emporis do not constitute significant coverage.
I see no evidence that the topic 'List of tallest buildings in Bhopal' is covered as a group by reliable secondary sources but I am happy to be proved wrong here.
No significant high-rise buildings under construction or even planned currently so little chance of future notability; no point in sending to draft.
The whole article is referenced entirely to routine database listings and primary sources which do nothing to evidence notability.
I really do not believe that a building being taller than 60m makes it notable. We do not set the bar so low in Delhi, Kolkata and other places with notably tall buildings.

Similar AfDs for reference: Gwalior and Ludhiana Spiderone 13:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings on the list are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, it does not assist in navigation, and does not serve any purpose under WP:AOAL. // Timothy :: talk 14:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as prodder. Geschichte (talk) 14:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, with the lack of significant coverage by reliable sources the predominant concern. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nomination. There is a lack of coverage about these buildings in reliable sources. LearnIndology (talk) 04:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.