Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political and geographical subdivisions by population

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of political and geographical subdivisions by population[edit]

List of political and geographical subdivisions by population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is incomplete, it seems the creator was initially going to make it look like this article but ended up not completing it. It looks unsatisfactory to a reader. Josedimaria237 (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the article being incomplete isn't necessarily a deletion criterion. It might be an argument for draftifying though. Spiderone 14:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or Draft per above. Meaningful article that needs more work. Abhi88iisc (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete would be a duplicate of List of country subdivisions by population if completed based on the title. The current list of population of arbitrary multi-national groupings is effectively WP:OR. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, or in the worst case Draftify. Random grouping of various entities doesn't make sense, no sources are given for the figures etc. The list in its current form is useless and misleading.--Darwinek (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify I agree with the proposed draftification. LearnIndology (talk) 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Inclusion criteria are exceptionally unclear. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Criteria is unclear and indiscrinate unsourced WP:OR; criteria makes it impossible see if it is discussed as a group by RS. Lack of sourcing and dating makes the list impossible to WP:V and the individual entries are almost certainly calculated (WP:OR) from different dates.   // Timothy :: talk  08:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.