Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one dance albums of 2011 (Australia)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of number-one dance albums of 2011 (Australia)[edit]

List of number-one dance albums of 2011 (Australia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of albums on a non-notable chart. Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Concur, fails LISTN. Ravenswing 09:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable chart so reaching number one on it is not a significant encyclopedic event. Can we add the 2012-2019 lists to this as well? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how to do that, but bundling would be ideal. Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Agree with Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars on 2012-2019, but not sure this can be changed. Maybe they can be WP:PROD if this turns out to be non-controversial.   // Timothy :: talk  23:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.