Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of national pickleball associations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of national pickleball associations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A new created list which does not expand on the primary topic in any meaningful manner. The only source is a primary source. This list would only be good if we had articles of the national associations instead of just countries. This fails WP:V and WP:N. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agreed, the links only go to countries, not the national associations of those nations. As such, it is a meaningless list. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:LISTN, links only to go the countries themselves. No notability whatsoever. Ajf773 (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I wrote this article using List of national tennis associations as a template. The aforementioned tennis article also only has one primary source, and none of the links therein link to their respective nations either. There is very little difference between these two articles. Therefore, I believe the reason for deletion is a double-standard. Cvscvs2 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS this is one of the arguments to avoid here. We don't judge any article based on any other article. Each article must be judged on it's own merits and applicable policy. What you do need to do if you think this list should stay is find the inclusion criteria that you think it meets and prove it with referencing or evidence. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.