Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of high schools in Washington by WIAA league alignment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Note that I interpreted !votes for userfy as delete. If any editor is interested in a userfied version of this article, I am certainly willing to provide same. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of high schools in Washington by WIAA league alignment[edit]

Wikipedia already has a List of high schools in Washington, but why do we need to get even more specific with a list by WIAA league? WP:SALAT says that even though the possibilities of stand-alone lists are infinite, we should also limit the amount of lists. Besides, the article consists of just headings and templates so it really isn't that encyclopedic. Tavix (talk) 20:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It seems the templates do the same job, and the reference is a page under construction. Ndenison ^talk 21:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom.S_RX 22:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Move - this is just a poorly named and organized list at this point. The subject is very valid. The article should be moved to List of high school athletics conferences in Washington and focus on the unique aspect of the article, the conference alignments.
Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 12:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userify per Orlady. This may be useful in the future. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userify - Article is too undeveloped for article space, but topic may be worthwhile. Move to the primary contributor's sandbox for additional development (assuming, of course, that the user has additional WP:RS content to add and is interested in building this). --Orlady (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.