Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foiled right-wing terrorist attacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of foiled right-wing terrorist attacks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a POV fork of List of terrorist incidents. Any content that isn't irredeemably biased belongs there along with all other terrorist incidents. This page should be deleted and set to redirect to List of terrorist incidents. AlanS^talk 06:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, Terrorism, and Lists. AlanS^talk 06:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I mentioned this on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of thwarted Islamic terrorist attacks that a main List of thwarted terrorist attacks would be more appropriate on a broader scale than this type of fork. Conyo14 (talk) 16:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. With the deletion of List of right-wing terrorist attacks, this clearly has to go. Srnec (talk) 17:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and other comments. Such an article is orphaned without List of right-wing terrorist attacks existing and the topic seems to depend on what the primary editor considers to be 'right-wing'. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am the author of the article, and I approve of its deletion, as it was clearly intended to complement the central page that was removed by consensus decision. However, I would like to note that I only followed the sources provided in assessing the represented movements, so the term POV is not applicable here, as I followed the sources. In any case, I fully agree with the deletion due to the main page being removed. AgisdeSparte (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@AgisdeSparte, while I'm generally against these sorts of listings because WP:NOTDATABASE, as mentioned by someone else List of thwarted terrorist attacks would be a better listing. AlanS^talk 11:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@AlanS I understand that, no problem from my part for the deletion of the page. Have a good day ! AgisdeSparte (talk) 12:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete …otherwise we let the the wiki terrorists win! ^[sarcasm] ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete curses! Foiled again! (In all seriousness “Failed” or even “thwarted” would be far less WP:POV but it’s a WP:FORK of a dead article) Dronebogus (talk) 09:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.