Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female boxers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of female boxers[edit]

Serves no purpose that isn't duplicated by the relevant category; see WP:CLS and this recent AFD. east718 // talk // email // 06:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with East718 on this one. This list is made redundant by the existance of the above category. Master&Expert (talk) 06:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. It can easily add information for nationality and years of activity, in which case it will be much more than what a category can do., DGG (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per comments by DGG. This list could be expanded with information a casual reader would find interesting.Neonblak (talk) 19:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep East718 - What part of the first paragraphs of Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates is unclear?--Mike Cline (talk) 01:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Redundant with category is not by itself a valid delete rationale. WP:CLS says so, so citing it in support of deletion is inexplicable. AndyJones (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.