Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of male boxers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of male boxers[edit]

As one of the most active member of the Boxing Project I dont like to see boxing articles deleted but this article is too big, of no real use and there is already a category which does the same job. Vintagekits (talk) 14:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 18:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, serves no particular purpose. Like the nom said. Punkmorten (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, if the Boxing Project doesn't even want it then, I'm guessing no one will. --T-rex 16:06, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above. Lady Galaxy 18:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete List that is extremely long and erroneous. It's extremely common for men to be boxers but I guess someone wanted to be PC after seeing List of female boxers. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 20:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete category and sub-categories do a much better and job. The list is impossible to maintain and update. --Jimbo^[online] 22:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the previous editor. -- Iterator12n ^Talk 01:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Insane, you need the list to track fighters, duh, only on wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddyboytoy (talk • contribs) 00:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]