Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Karisma Kapoor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Karisma Kapoor. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Karisma Kapoor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are not enough awards to justify its own page. Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Systematic bias was, fairly, discussed at the last AfD in 2007. Wikipedia has changed a lot since 2007, and so have its guidelines, so as it has been tagged again for notability, I feel a 2nd AfD should help resolve this once and for all. Boleyn (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I've no idea who Karisma Kapoor is but suppose that they are big in Bollywood. Anyway, there's a very obvious alternative to deletion here – merger into the article about the subject. See WP:BEFORE, WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:IGNORINGATD; &c.

Furthermore, I see that there is talk of a previous AfD but the nominator can't be bothered to provide a link. Please note that WP:DELAFD states that "It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome." Blocking the nominator in this case would perhaps be too severe but we should perhaps consider restricting their use of AfD as there are over 60,000 more articles to go in this backlog baloney, right? Andrew🐉(talk) 11:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

user:Andrew Davidson, can you please not speak to other editors in this way? 'I see that there is talk...the nominator can't be bothered to...' I was the one raising the 'talk', mention of a previous AfD, and I assumed it would link here as normal automatically. I'm quite happy to add it now you've pointed out this error. 'Disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome...' I haven't nominated this page before, and as I raised, the last discussion on it was 2007, before I started on Wikipedia and when guidelines were very different. Here is the link to the 2007 AfD: [1] It was part of a large bundle. Bundling can be useful but I'm usually wary of it, as each page often deserves their own consideration, and I am not sure in this AfD how much this individal page was looked at. Boleyn (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably frustrated by just how many pointless deletion discussions you keep starting. Next time just merge it over. All articles for people have a list of notable awards they've won in their own article, or if too big to fit its tossed into a spinout article. Dream Focus 14:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Karisma Kapoor, independent page not needed.--Hippeus (talk) 11:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Karisma Kapoor --Devokewater @ 11:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Karisma Kapoor per above. // Timothy :: talk 14:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to to Karisma Kapoor per above. This is obviously a WP:SPLIT from the parent article so LISTN and GNG are not helpful here (unless the individual failed GNG, or there were no notable awards listed). Deleting this yet not covering notable awards a notable individual has been nominated for or won at their own page is not an acceptable result; please read WP:ATD and WP:BEFORE prior to nominating anything. postdlf (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Unclear what is disruptive about two nominations thirteen years apart, someone just likes to complain about process. Reywas92^Talk 05:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MERGE It'll fit in the person's main article, then merge it. Dream Focus 14:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.