Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World Amateur Bodybuilding Championships medalists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Amateur Bodybuilding Championships medalists[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not appear as though any of the individuals or individual competitions in this list are notable. The main page of the topic likely adequately covers it without this large list of names. No references of any kind. N419 BH 05:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Doesn't the fact that it is a list of "Amateur" anything pretty much tell us it is likely to not be notable? Dennis Brown (talk) 01:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Some of these amateurs have gone on to become professionals and others have gone on to become notable in other sports such as boxing. Either way this is still a World Championship and as such is a notable event. The event itself meets WP:GNG from the media coverage of all the championships. Google has more than 30k hits on this series of championships. This list also supplements the article called World Amateur Bodybuilding Championships. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 02:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Nipsonanomhmata. --Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk) 08:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as of Nipsonanomhmata. Kante4 (talk) 20:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An example of the beginnings of a good list--the kind of list article that Wikipedia needs more of.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:06, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.