Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thomas & Friends railway engines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of characters in The Railway Series. Tone 00:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Thomas & Friends railway engines[edit]

List of Thomas & Friends railway engines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN, WP:IINFO because the list has no evidence of independent notability and offers nothing more than being an unnecessary in-universe list. It has been tagged as a concern for over a decade and does not belong in an encyclopaedia. Pure WP:FANCRUFT Spiderone 18:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh dear. In looking at this, I started following links to the extant articles about individual engines, as well as the other "narrow gauge" list and its characters. So far every article that I've clicked on has been either unsourced or primary sourced. Seems like a set of pages perhaps best taken to ttte.fandom.com? I don't have a great sense of the notability of any of this stuff, and a search for sources is made difficult by low quality results... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fancruft at its best. It has a better place on Fandom Wiki. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.