Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NFC champions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 17:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of NFC champions[edit]

List of NFC champions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant, as this is covered in the NFC Championship article. Piranha249 16:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 19:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 19:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge The pages as they stand now consist of two separate sources of information. SportingFlyer talk
  • Keep - Most of the information here is not included in the NFC Championship article, and does not belong there since that article is about the game, not the team. Rlendog (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Perfectly valid list article. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notability is certainly achieved, the only reason to delete would be any possible redundancy or another "operational" deletion, which is fine for discussion of course. I believe both articles are worthwhile to be kept because the list itself has meaning and the length of the list is becoming large, which can make a single article clumsy or unwieldy. There's likely some crossover (both necessary and unnecessary) so care needs to be taken in the editing of the content of both articles--but that is an editing issue and not a deletion issue.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Passes notability required for standalone lists. The article for the game has details about the game, its score and location. This list focuses on the details of the team itself and its players. WikiVirusC(talk) 15:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.