Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Middlesex County Cricket Club Twenty20 cricketers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Middlesex County Cricket Club Twenty20 cricketers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTPEOPLE Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the list does not fail WP:LISTPEOPLE, the players listed are all individually notable, they just aren't linked in the article. For example "D Alleyne" is David Alleyne, "GK Berg" is Gareth Berg, "MM Betts" is Melvyn Betts, etc etc -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- .....and in fact they now are all linked -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A list of Middlesex County Cricket Club Twenty20 cricketers is in the public interest. All entries have been linked to existing Wikipedia entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:8496:D100:E983:4D93:D46E:4759 (talk) 09:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per ChrisTheDude; the nomination reason is erroneous. Harrias ^talk 09:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Strange nomination, meets the inclusion criteria for lists and is one of numerous lists of cricketers across all formats. StickyWicket (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Withdrawing my nomination. Article has been improved to the extent where notability is clear. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.