Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gambian politicians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. A frivolous nomination, easily rebutted by the discussion participants and by express guidelines. postdlf (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gambian politicians[edit]

List of Gambian politicians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

we already have categories for politicians. And lists like this (imagine if we created for United States) would be forever excessively long LibStar (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per WP:NOTDUP, categories, list articles and navigation boxes are complementary. Also per NOTDUP, "Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided." Northamerica1000(talk) 03:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Lists and categories are not mutually exclusive. If lists get too long they can be split. --Michig (talk) 08:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In future the list could be improved with notes and references on the various people. It is a very suitable topic. It does not matter what would happen with a list of US politicians. Thincat (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As already mentioned, lists and categories are complementary, not mutually exclusive. Should we call this a WP:SNOW, or continue the discussion? Novusuna talk 11:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Wikipedia has various lists of American politicians[1], so I don't know what the proposer is complaining about. List of Irish politicians was kept in an AfD 2 years ago[2]; List of South African politicians was kept in 2009. Useful for listing entries on politicians in a country suffering from systemic bias. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.