Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bollywood films of 2020

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) MrClog (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bollywood films of 2020[edit]

List of Bollywood films of 2020 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a future events which may or may not be accurate. HagennosTalk 04:50, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Similar to 2020 in film. While that article primarily presents the English-language releases, this one lists the films in Hindi language. The sources aren't the best, but most of them are from film journalist Taran Adarsh's verified Twitter account, so they are fine for now. DeluxeVegan (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment None of that statement is a logical reason to keep. Trillfendi (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 12:26, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 12:26, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. 94rain Talk 14:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This kind of list passes WP:LISTN. If a film is notable per the guidelines and is scheduled for release (with a source) it could be included on a list. Heck the 2020 in film list suggests that even unnamed films could be included. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Doesn't appear to fail WP:NOTCRYSTAL. If the content is inaccurate it should be addressed by the editor, or discussed in talk.Ajf773 (talk) 09:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep - Plenty of reliable sources. Besides, the article will have to be recreated if it gets deleted. Foxnpichu (talk) 14:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.