Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limketkai Office Building

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Limketkai Office Building[edit]

Limketkai Office Building (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about the office building, not the hotel or other similarly named entities. The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance WP:NBUILD. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. It has mentions about articles regarding tenants, but nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. This is a nice, normal, building, not an encyclopedic topic.   // Timothy :: talk  22:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  22:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per Nom. It is a "nice, normal, building, not an encyclopedic topic." Otr500 (talk) 10:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I do not find anything that makes this building notable. Jeepday (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a non-notable office building that fails GNG Spiderone 18:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — I agree with the nom's rationale. Celestina007 (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.