Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LightAdmin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LightAdmin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about software released just yesterday. Lack of available reliable sources suggest that the subject is not notable. Fails WP:NSOFT. - Mr X 20:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 13:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 13:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per Whpq. Just not notable. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 15:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not appear to have received coverage in reliable sources, let alone significant coverage. Zero Google News archive hits [1] and zero Google Books hits [2]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.