Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lidya Pratiwi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 23:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lidya Pratiwi[edit]

Lidya Pratiwi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP1E. nn actor with minor name mentions other than the 1E. Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  19:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete since subjects lacks independent notability, failing WP:GNG, despite the effort to load up the text with citations. We get interviews about her conversion to Christianty, such as this, a simple cv in a gossip mag, reports of her infamous murder charge and incarceration, and so on. A commendable attempt to build a mountain out of a mole hill but ultimately it fails. Text not saved by WP:NCREATIVE, either. -The Gnome (talk) 16:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.