Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leicester City Football League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 19:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leicester City Football League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This league isn't part of the tiered non-league English system. "The league now only runs veterans divisions which are not considered part of the non-league system." It therefore needs to pass WP:GNG but there appears to be little to no coverage. Spiderone 17:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - to be honest the league probably isn't notable anyway, but worth pointing out that notability is not temporary, and the fact that the league now only runs a vets division (which seem to be the basis of the nom) doesn't mean it didn't offer a higher level of football in the past....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's a poorly worded nom from me. With that being said, for a competition that's been going for 120 years, the lack of coverage is astonishing. Admittedly, it's very hard to search for sources when you have to wade through all the sources relating to Leicester City F.C. Spiderone 19:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while it's true that the league now only runs veterans divisions, there's no indication that it was ever notable. Nigej (talk) 07:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.