Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Legends of Chima Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Hey man im josh (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Legends of Chima Online[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is entirely unsourced, and I am quite sure that the article topic is non-notable. In English, I could only find one RS discussing the game in a significant manner besides standard release information. Checking the linked other-language versions of the page, there don't seem to be any non-English RS with significant coverage of the game either. QuietCicada (talk) 15:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator Thank you both for finding those sources. :) QuietCicada (talk) 12:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Comics and animation, Games, Toys, and Internet. — Karnataka ^talk 16:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep It got a review from GameZebo and a feature in Game Informer. It also got a review from Common Sense Media and an announcement from PCGamesN that nevertheless has some basic analysis. The first two are obviously the strongest, but based on the combined sourcing I think it squeaks past the notability line. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the above, there seems to be a fairly in-depth postmortem article on the failure of the game in this magazine: [1]. Other announcement-type articles are covered in outlets such as Polygon: [2]. There seems to be enough sources to establish notability. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the references listed above. The nomination has apparently been withdrawn as well. - Indefensible (talk) 15:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.