Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Beurre et l'argent du beurre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Le Beurre et l'argent du beurre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable film, failing WP:NFILM prod removed by creator, one of several films all from the same festival created by this same editor. Most nominated (excepting those winning several awards given then benefit of the doubt) Gaijin42 (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Coverage in multiple sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Coverage in multiple, easily found sources [1] to show meeting WP:NF. We do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added some refs: most are rather primary in nature but there is at least one bona fide third-party RS (the short International News item). Not surprisingly, the film's critique of fair trade seems to have garnered a significant deal of attention worldwide, in certain circles. Even if deleted, I believe the film could be cited as a reliable source in Fair trade#What happens to the money. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added the film to the See also section of the main article, with a brief summary. I believe it could be better integrated into the main text, but at least it's there, for now. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References aplenty. First Light (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.