Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Vegas Film Critics Society (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas Film Critics Society[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A redlink editor has been going around over the last couple of days deliberately recreating multiple deleted pages of non-notable, minor, regional film-critic groups that get no coverage for the organizations themselves and seldom get their awards mentioned in national press. WikiProject Film consensus in 2015 was to relieve the bloat of non-notable awards in film articles. But publicists like to tout awards and fans of particular films love to heap as many awards onto those films' pages as they can, no matter how minor or meaningless. By recreating multiple deleted pages in one day, that redlink editor is disrupting Wikipedia. Tenebrae (talk) 20:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless there are third-party sources that indicate the notability of these awards. 331dot (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. No in-depth sources other than the one primary source. SW3 5DL (talk) 03:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per 331dot. Anyone can make a group or an awards show, doesn't mean that it means anything. South Nashua (talk) 13:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.