Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land of Indians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Due to failing to meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Land of Indians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. Other than its IMDb entry (where the full title is given as Land of Indians: a Story Before Vishwavijay), no information appears to be available about this film. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-You have to love the unsourced "positive feedback" which unless if I'm missing something is not on the IMDB link. (I'm going to remove that statement). Anyway unless if this somehow is nominated for best short film not notable it appears. Or I should say unless if it actually gets some press somehow. Wgolf (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:NOTPROMOTION of a new filmmaker's release to YouTube only as a 3-minute promotional device for his hoped-for longer film Vishwavijay (2016) No coverage, no reviews. No reliable sources. Fails WP:NF in all aspects. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This film has already released and thus deleting it may not be good at all. Further changes may be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.88.232 (talk) 06:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Do not delete~~ The film may not be notable but when it had released, there mustn't be a question of deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.88.232 (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC) Struck IP's extra vote. Only one per customer. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete As my film has already released, I don't think you should delete it. Rest depends on what you all want to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superprashast (talk • contribs) 06:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but simply having created and released a 3-minute film to YouTube is not a notability. Go study WP:NF to see what our inclusion criteria are. Get your film some coverage and analysis in reliable sources (not blogs, not forums) and then ask for it to be WP:REFUNDED. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Then merge this page till it becomes notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.88.232 (talk) 13:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Merge to what? Is there a related article? Does the director have a Wikipedia article? Or any of the actors? I don't see a viable merge target. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.