Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lackawanna Rapids
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lackawanna Rapids[edit]
- Lackawanna Rapids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-sourced non-notable team, no indication of whether or not it actually exists; appears to be possible hoax Mhking (talk) 21:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: appears to be an elaborate hoax. No mention of this team, its competitors, their players, or the parks they supposedly play in anywhere except on their leaguelineup website, which anybody can create. A historic maximum crowd of 17, but they have operated professionally for six years, have player contracts, managers and a Hall of Fame? An all-star game for a league that consists of four teams and seems to have a couple dozen players total? Unlikely. Certainly not notable, even if it is real. Baileypalblue (talk) 22:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. No opinion on deletion but I have added the hoax tag to the article per above comments. KuyaBriBriTalk 22:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since I couldn't verify this information, which is what an encyclopedia is supposed to allow. Drmies (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable, unverifiable, no reliable sources, possible hoax. Camw (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a Hoax, enough if not, it fails notablility.--Bhockey10 (talk) 02:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.