Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Gata (2014 telenovela)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Draft:La Gata (2014 telenovela). A promo having aired is not a notability criterion. That said, given that it's airing in a few days, it would be pointless to delete this now and likely have to restore it very soon, so I'm moving it to the draft namespace until it's ready. King of ♠ 02:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La Gata (2014 telenovela)[edit]

La Gata (2014 telenovela) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. WP:HAMMER and WP:CRYSTAL. → Call me Hahc21 03:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Note that this says that its premiere will be on May 5 and has very little credible reference. It would be better if they have already create promotional?. When its release is really something true.--Jorge Horan (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I also agree they are cleared. They are not even soap operas have aired. No guarantee they air. And besides these items have very little credible references.--GeorgeMilan / talk 17:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Considering production has apparently only just started, the source of which is two line article on some sort of industry website, this article fails WP:GNG and WP:FUTURE. Way too premature, there's simply no significant coverage yet. mikeman67 (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.