Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LPS Grade 6 Maths Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted.If the creator wants this information sent to them, they are free to contact me. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 14:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LPS Grade 6 Maths Game[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As worded by Smjg: This looks like just some random competition in a random school, not appropriate content for an encyclopedia. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

userfy Either useful work outside of Wikipedia or sandbox work so deletion is probably suboptimal. But yeah, this doesn't belong in mainspace. Hobit (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)ii[reply]
Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7 as an article about an organized event that provides no indication of its significance. So tagged. Note also the corresponding discussion of Template:LPS Grade 6 Maths Game Groups at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 23. Do not userfy; Wikipedia is not a web host and this content is not about building an encyclopedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine, but at least let them know we can mail it to them. Odds are good this is a kid learning how to do Wikipedia mark up. No reason to drive them off. Hobit (talk) 18:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, I agree it's speedy eligible, though I think that's unwise without the mail offer. Hobit (talk) 18:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.