Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvelertak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kvelertak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Although there appears to be some buzz about them in the blogosphere, there is no coverage in reliable sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Their self-titled album debuted at the third place of VG-lista [1][2]. I have also found a lot of non-trivial coverage in Norwegian newspapers. Two of those articles are listed in the article as external links. BBC Radio One has had their single "Mjød" as Single Of The Week two weeks in a row.[3] Rettetast (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This band seems to satisfy our notability criteria for musical artists. __meco (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.