Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristy Stott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 23:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kristy Stott[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed google test. I dream of horses (T) @ 23:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough secondary sources for either WP:GNG or WP:JOURNALIST New Media Theorist (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google results are mostly articles written by the subject and social media. We need independent coverage, such as news articles written about the subject. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 11:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill freelance journalist/blogger. Bearian (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It is straightforward to find articles that she has written but, as a creative professional, nothing to indicate that she is notable according to the criteria set out in WP:JOURNALIST. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.