Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristal Kola

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kristal Kola[edit]

Kristal Kola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Chidgk1 (talk) 18:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gazozlu (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I can't figure out if the artilcle is about the company or the cola. The product doesn't seem notable. The company is WP:LISTED, but that guideline says that notability isn't inherent in listed companies. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as article about the company, Kristal Kola ve Mesrubat Sanayi Ticaret AS. It's exchange-listed and a member of the BIST 100 index fund, with a market cap of 1.81B, reportedly the 4th largest (by market cap) beverages company in Turkey, so almost certain to have sources available, although they will be in Turkish. Jfire (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I found this, passes GNG. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 02:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quite some significant and independent coverage in this journal article, but weird enough that's actually the only real source I could find. The piece found above by HelpingWorld fails WP:ORGIND since it basically recites a press release. This article (requires TWL access) says that it has been the worst Turkish beverage company in terms of "activity" since 2005. Not a clear-cut case of notability. ~StyyxTalk? 18:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I've been unable to find much coverage. Lots of BRIEFs in Reuters, but I assume this doesn't count as substantial coverage. There are probably Turkish sources available, but one might need to know what exactly it is they're looking for. Mooonswimmer 21:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no WP:RS for WP:N. Does not meet WP:GNG or any WP:SNG.  // Timothy :: talk  21:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.