Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosuke Kato
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 16:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kosuke Kato[edit]
- Kosuke Kato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Isn't funny! rubbish Bneidror (talk) 13:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm thinking Speedy Delete as hoax as being born in 1993 and being 18 today are mutually exclusive. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete absolute garbage. JuJube (talk) 23:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fictional "official" website. Yawn. -- Hoary (talk) 10:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Appears to be a hoax. External links don't work. -- Taku (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no "Setagaya Prefecture". That, and multiple other reasons (such as WP:V) lead me to believe this is a hoax. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reason to believe this is real Fg2 (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Since I've participated in this AfD, perhaps I shouldn't close it. Recommendation: close it (WP:SNOW), and then indefblock the creator of the article as a vandalism-only account. If you don't happen to know Japanese, you won't realize that an English equivalent of his name "Unchigoro" would be "Shitbert", "Shitfred", or similar: a clue as to what might be inside his head. -- Hoary (talk) 06:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think this user has no idea, or its a hoax. Yes unchigoro does mean the nasty stuff. There are no articles to back anything. Yama88 (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.