Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobus Van Rensburg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kobus Van Rensburg[edit]

Kobus Van Rensburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, this televangelist fails WP:BASIC. Coverage found is quite limited, with very little information available in reliable sources. North America1000 23:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Interesting character, a "prophet" who claimed to have risen from the dead and made miraculous cures. However the sources given are mostly not independent, and although I can find a few sources - [1][2][3], in particular this- [4], I don't think they are significant enough to qualify under WP:GNG. A marginal delete, perhaps more will turn up later to save the article Hzh (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The few news articles have minimal depth. The HTS article mentioned as most significant by Hzh appears to be a different person. Daask (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, it is a different person, my mistake. Read too quickly and didn't notice the the biographical details do not match. Hzh (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for lack of indepth independent sources, even of other people with the same name. Now if he were also this guy, … --GRuban (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.