Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinza Hashmi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kinza Hashmi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to have minor roles in TV programmes . fails to meet WP:ACTORS. Saqib (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~: Wikipedia doesn't see minor roles when there are significant coverage of sources (like this. I have found many sources regarding her talent, skills, well-known personality, and I don't think it should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SahabAliwadia (talk • contribs) 12:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SahabAliwadia: Please cite the sources which can demonstrate and establish the notability of the subject. Merely being in the news doesn't qualify one to merit an entry on Wikipedia. We have criteria for actors at WP:ACTORS which the subject need to meet in order to get a standalone bio page. We don't usually have bios on any other actors, having minor roles in TV programmes. --Saqib (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:Per Saqib. SahabAli wadia 10:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anoptimistix "Message Me" 04:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 1 non-blocked editor has participated in this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 05:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Greenbörg (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.