Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Tae-rae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Zerobaseone. ✗plicit 13:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Tae-rae[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. I believe that this page could be G10'd but I'm going to leave it in AfD. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 12:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Korea. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable, all sources appear to be primary or WP:USERG

WhichUser AmI 13:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the band article, Zerobaseone. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zerobaseone. Non-notable. I would !vote merge, but the content is not backed up by and RS/non-USERG sources. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding Delete for the reasons mentioned above, particularly WP:USERG sources. Gapbridger (talk) 01:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.