Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ju Ae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirected to Kim Ju-ae. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kim Ju Ae[edit]
- Kim Ju Ae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significance, wp:blp or wp:toosoon, this should just be under personal life of the parent ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kim Ju-ae since it's the same article forked. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with her dad's article; I agree with WP:TOOSOON, she may warrant an article in the future, but not yet. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect I was considering that given that the only source (at the core) is Dennis Rodman's word that she exists. No reason to believe he's making it up, but at the same time, he is not what would be considered a reliable source for BLP claims. --MASEM (t) 13:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect, and Kim Ju-ae, to Kim Jong-un. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This AfD really should be procedurally closed since it's a clear WP:FORK of Kim Ju-ae, it's the same article. We can't vote merge or delete for this article since the article already exists elsewhere which is not under AfD. This AfD should have never happened, I don't think the nom realized there was a fork condition. --Green Cardamom (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was unaware there was an existing article, both were created the same day. Should I WP:CSD#A10 it instead, leave it as AfD, or blank and redirect for the hyphenation in the name?--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I would WP:CSD#A10 it, then start a new AfD with the other article, if you want. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I would WP:CSD#A10 it, then start a new AfD with the other article, if you want. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was unaware there was an existing article, both were created the same day. Should I WP:CSD#A10 it instead, leave it as AfD, or blank and redirect for the hyphenation in the name?--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A10, then discuss on the other AfD. Ansh666 18:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.