Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khawar Qureshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 03:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khawar Qureshi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: various problems including failing to meet WP:GNG and written like a résumé.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 07:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly passes GNG. -Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 14:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple mentions in WP:RS over an extended period (since at least 2017). Prominent lawyer trying cases in international courts. Clearly meets WP:GNG. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Easily passes WP:GNG. I have done some work on the article (especially WP:OVERLINK); much more remains to be done. Edwardx (talk) 15:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per this addition I just made. Seems to be sought after in a number of notable criminal cases. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my points on the BLP noticeboard. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.