Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelechi Iheanacho (footballer born 1996) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kelechi Iheanacho (footballer born 1996)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD was closed (by nominator) some time ago as a no consensus, while partially waiting to see if further particulars would become available. Several editors disagreed with the decision and requested another AfD be proposed at some point in the future.

It does not appear the set of facts has changed since the last AfD therefore the somewhat inclusionist no consensus close does not appear to stand on it's own.

Seeking consensus on the future of this article. Tawker (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The facts have not changed so my opinion has not changed. He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no change at all in the article. previous concerns still stand, *Delete - player who has not played in a fully professional league nor senior international football so fails WP:NFOOTY still stands. No indication of any other achievements garner significant reliable coverage to pass WP:GNG either. Coverage that does exist is WP:ROUTINE match reporting / transfer speculation, with only minor elements referring to wider performances at youth team level, appearances at that level do not confer notability per WP:NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - still fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.