Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karyl McBride

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karyl McBride[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Karyl McBride appears to be some random self-help guru. She's definitely not notable beyond her books, and those don't seem too notable either. ~Strawberry of Arctic Circle System (talk) 14:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Some of her books have reviews and she's used as a subject matter expert in this PBS program [1], seems to be at notability. Oaktree b (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources added to the article help support her WP:BASIC notability as an author and subject matter expert/therapist. There is sustained international coverage, including in The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Maclean's, ABC Radio National, The Daily Telegraph, etc. The are multiple reviews for one of her books; another was featured by The New York Times Well Book Club, and the most recent one on PBS. Beccaynr (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Beccaynr and WP: NAUTHOR. pburka (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sourcing is now sufficient per WP:NAUTHOR. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 03:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.